The Future of Media Mergers in Ireland
Key changes proposed under the General Scheme of the Media Regulation Bill

The Irish Government recently approved the General Scheme of the Media Regulation Bill. The General Scheme proposes to modernise the media merger regime in Ireland. It will also implement the European Media Freedom Act, which takes effect in August 2025. Our Competition, Antitrust & Foreign Investment team reviews the key changes proposed.
What you need to know
At a high-level, the main changes proposed by the General Scheme include:
- Expanding the definition of a ‘media business’ to bring online platforms providing access to media content in scope.
- Capturing transactions involving only one media business, which must be active in the State.
- Limiting the definition of a ‘media merger’ to transactions having a clear Irish nexus.
- Transferring responsibility for media mergers from the Minister for Culture, Communications and Sport to Ireland’s media regulator, Coimisiún na Meán (CnaM).
- Giving CnaM the power to ‘call in’ transactions that do not trigger a mandatory media merger notification.
- Introducing new criminal offences, to supplement the existing criminal offences, including for failing to notify a ‘called-in’ merger, non-compliance with a Requirement for Information, and breaching the standstill obligation (i.e. gun-jumping).
- Creating a new voluntary notification option for transactions not requiring a mandatory notification.
The backdrop
The current framework for Ireland’s media merger regime is set out in Part 3A of the Competition Act. The review of media mergers in Ireland considers both the effect on competition and media plurality
Media mergers not triggering a merger filing under the EU Merger Regulation are required to be first notified to the Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (CCPC). Following approval by either the European Commission or the CCPC, a media merger must subsequently be notified to the Minister for Culture, Communications and Sport for assessment on media plurality grounds. Media plurality is assessed by reference to diversity of ownership and content.
The Government approved the General Scheme of the Media Regulation Bill in July 2025. The General Scheme outlines the key provisions of the Media Regulation Bill and sets out the broad framework of Government policy to guide the drafting of the Bill. The overarching objective is to transpose the European Media Freedom Act (EMFA), which will in turn modernise Ireland’s existing media merger regime. As an EU Regulation, the EMFA is directly applicable in Ireland, though some elements - such those relating to the standard of media merger review - require transposition.
What’s changing: A closer look at the General Scheme
Online platforms may be a ‘media business’
The concept of a ‘media business’ will be broadened to include both a media service provider and online platforms providing access to media content. The definition of a ‘media service’ will align with Article 2(1) of the EMFA – i.e., a service where the principal purpose is to provide programmes or press publications, under the editorial responsibility of the provider, to the general public, by any means, “to inform, entertain or educate.”
By contrast, the current definition of a ‘media business’ focuses on traditional media, such as broadcasting services and programmes or content “consisting substantially of news and comment on current affairs.” Online platforms are not presently captured unless they come in scope of the definition of a ‘broadcasting service’ by providing linear programmes over the internet (a change that was introduced by the Online Safety and Media Regulation Act 2022).
The changes proposed by the General Scheme will substantially modernise the definition of a ‘media business.’ As a result, the updated media merger regime will apply to providers of a broader range of content beyond traditional news and current affairs content to include, for example, entertainment content. It will also apply to operators of a wider variety of content delivery platforms, beyond traditional broadcasting services to potentially include social networking services and video streaming services.
A clear nexus with Ireland will be required to trigger a filing requirement
Proposed changes to the definition of a ‘media merger’ will helpfully narrow the application of the media merger regime
to transactions capable of having an impact on media pluralism or editorial independence in the State. The General
Scheme proposes that, for a transaction to amount to a ‘media merger’:
- In an acquisition scenario, the target must carry on a media business in the State
- In a merger scenario, the post-merger undertaking must be a media business in the State, and
- In a joint venture scenario, one of the joint venture parent companies must carry on a media business in the State and the joint venture must be a media business in the State.
This is a welcome development. It contrasts with the existing regime under which transactions that have no potential to impact on media pluralism in the State can trigger a technical filing requirement.
Transactions involving a single media business may be a ‘media merger’
The changes to the definition of a ‘media merger’, as outlined above, mean that the media merger regime will capture transactions involving a single media business, which must be ‘in the State’. This is a departure from the current position, where at least two media businesses, one of which must carry on a media business in the State, are required to be a party to a transaction for it to amount to a ‘media merger’.
A media business will be deemed to be ‘in the State’ only if it made sales in the State of not less than €2 million in the most recent financial year. The existing alternative test of a physical presence coupled with, any amount of, sales in the State will be disposed of.
Editorial independence will be a focus of the substantive assessment
To ensure full alignment with the EMFA, which requires an assessment of the impact of media mergers on both media pluralism and editorial independence, the substantive test will be amended. It will now include explicit reference to editorial independence as a relevant consideration.
In practice, the Minister already takes editorial independence into account as one of several factors when considering how a media merger might affect media plurality. However, the proposed changes elevate the importance of editorial independence in the context of the substantive assessment.
Transfer of responsibility for media mergers to CnaM
The General Scheme proposes to transfer full responsibility for the assessment of media mergers from the Minister to Ireland’s media regulator, Coimisiún na Meán. This change will implement the requirement under the EMFA that the regulator under the Audiovisual Media Services Directive is substantively involved in the media merger assessment.
Introduction of a new call-in power
CnaM will be given a call-in power over transactions that do not qualify as a ‘media merger.’ CnaM will be able to exercise this power over transaction involving at least one media business and which may, in the opinion of CnaM, have a significant impact on media plurality or editorial independence in the State.
The General Scheme confirms that the ‘call-in’ power is designed to apply only in exceptional cases. These are situations where a transaction that would not otherwise require notification as a media merger may still significantly impact media pluralism or editorial independence and therefore warrants regulatory scrutiny. Specific examples include:
- Transactions involving local media entities with low turnover but the potential to affect media plurality locally, e.g. local radio stations
- The acquisition of a target media business that is small or in its infancy but has significant market share or influence, and
- Roll-ups of media businesses, i.e., where a single purchaser incrementally acquires multiple smaller media businesses, none of which individually meet notification thresholds, but collectively build up market dominance
This change will align the powers of CnaM with those of the CCPC under the Competition Act and the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment under the Screening of Third Country Transactions Act 2023. However, CnaM’s call-in power has the potential to be significantly more burdensome and potentially disruptive to deal timelines. This is because the transaction will be required to first undergo a competition review by the CCPC, if it has not already been reviewed by the European Commission or the CCPC, before it can be notified to CnaM.
New voluntary notification option
The General Scheme propose to introduce a voluntary notification option for mergers and acquisitions involving at least one media business. The voluntary notification option is available both pre- and post-completion of the relevant transaction. This may be an attractive avenue for parties who perceive a high-risk of the transaction being called-in for review by CnaM.
Creation of new criminal offences
The General Scheme also proposes to introduce criminal offences for:
- Not notifying a ‘called-in’ transaction
- Failing to comply with an information request from CnaM, or
- Implementing a media merger prior to receipt of CnaM’s determination, i.e., gun-jumping
These new penalties supplement existing criminal offences which include fines and periodic penalty payments for failing to submit a mandatory media merger notification.
Impact on media mergers: legal and strategic implications
The changes proposed by the General Scheme reflect a more nuanced and modern approach to media merger review in Ireland. The key implications include:
- Technology companies, streaming services and social media platforms may now be subject to media merger scrutiny.
- More deals could be caught by the mandatory notification requirement, but only if the target, the merged entity, or the joint venture, has or will have meaningful Irish activity.
- Responsibility for media mergers is transitioned to CnaM. Combined with the review standards under the EMFA, this means advisers and parties should expect more detailed and potentially stricter review of media mergers.
- Even small or local media businesses e.g., radio stations or niche platforms, that do not trigger a filing requirement could be subject to scrutiny if CnaM decides to exercise its call-in power. This is a particular risk for parties to a transaction that is part of a broader roll-up strategy.
- Non-compliance with the media merger regime will come with heightened legal risk – parties will need to be increasingly vigilant about compliance with the notification requirement and procedural rules.
In short, for investors and media businesses alike, the new media merger regime will mean more careful deal planning.
Outlook
The Media Regulation Bill will soon be sent for pre-legislative scrutiny to the Oireachtas Committee on Arts, Media, Communications, Culture and Sport. The Oireachtas Committee will examine the heads of the Bill before it is drafted and publish a report with recommendations to the Government. As part of the pre-legislative scrutiny process, interested stakeholders may have the opportunity to provide input and feedback. Once drafted, the Bill must then pass through five stages in each house of parliament, the Dáil and Seanad, before being signed into law by the President.
As this Bill is a priority drafting item within the Government’s summer legislative agenda, and the EMFA is due to take effect imminently, it is anticipated that the Media Regulation Bill will be implemented over the coming months.
Download a copy of this insight
Early
engagement on these significant proposed legislative changes is advisable.
Please get in touch with a member of our Competition,
Antitrust & Foreign Investment team, or Data & Technology team for more information.
The content of this article is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute legal or other advice.
Share this:
Tara Kelly
Partner, Head of Competition, Antitrust & Foreign Investment
+353 86 145 5201 tarakelly@mhc.ie