Contributory Negligence

In Irish law, contributory negligence is a commonly pleaded in the defence of personal injury cases. It is based on the idea that a person has a duty to act reasonably and to avoid putting themselves at risk of harm. If a court decides that a plaintiff acted in a way that contributed to their own injury, this can reduce the level of damages they are able to recover. For example, a finding of contributory negligence may be made against a driver in a road traffic accident claim who failed to wear their seatbelt.

Origins of contributory negligence

The concept of contributory negligence has its roots in English common law. It was developed as a way to ensure fairness in negligence cases, by taking into account the actions of both the defendant and the plaintiff. Over time, the principle has evolved and been adapted by different legal systems, including Irish law.

Contributory negligence in Irish Law

In Irish law, contributory negligence is provided for under Section 34 of the Civil Liability Act, 1961. Contributory negligence must be specifically pleaded by a defendant and is applied as a partial defence to a claim. This means that if a plaintiff is found to be partially responsible for their own injury, the amount of damages they can recover will be reduced proportionately.

The degree of reduction is determined by the court, based on the facts of the case and the plaintiff’s conduct. For example, if the court finds that the plaintiff was 25% responsible for their own injury, they will only be able to recover 75% of their damages. The application of contributory negligence involves a two-step process. First, the court must determine whether the defendant was negligent. If the defendant is found to be negligent, the court then considers whether the plaintiff also contributed to their own injury.

The degree of contributory negligence is determined by the court on a case-by-case basis. The court will consider all the facts and circumstances of the case, including the actions of both parties, in making this determination.

Key cases in Irish Law

There have been several key cases in Irish law that have helped to shape the application of contributory negligence. One such case is O'Connell v. Jackson which established the principle that a claimant's negligence does not automatically bar them from recovering damages, but rather reduces the amount they can recover.

Another significant case is McGrath v. Trintech Group Plc. In this case the court held that a claimant's contributory negligence can be considered even if the defendant's negligence is more serious. This case reinforced the principle that contributory negligence is not an all-or-nothing defence, but rather a proportional one.

Criticisms of contributory negligence

While contributory negligence is a widely accepted principle in Irish law, it is not without its criticisms. One of the main criticisms is that it can result in unfair outcomes, particularly in cases where the claimant's negligence is minor compared to that of the defendant.

It can also be argued that the determination of the degree of contributory negligence involves a subjective assessment by the court, which can lead to inconsistent outcomes.

For more information and expert advice, contact a member of our Insurance & Risk team.

The content of this article is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute legal or other advice.